1-step vs 2-step challenge: which MOJA plan fits you
One path is faster; the other filters consistency twice. Neither is “easier” — they reward different risk maturity levels.
Plan comparison
Standard MOJA Funded spot evaluation paths at a glance.
| Rule | 2-step (standard) | 1-step (accelerated) |
|---|---|---|
| Profit target | 8% Phase 1 + 5% Phase 2 | 10% single target |
| Daily drawdown | 5% | 4% |
| Max drawdown | 10% | 7% |
| Min trading days | 7 per phase | Per plan terms |
| Best for | Traders building track record | Disciplined traders with proven process |
Which should you choose?
Choose 2-step if…
You want more room to recover from a red week within the same phase, you are newer to prop firm rules, or you prefer proving consistency twice with standard 5%/10% drawdown.
Choose 1-step if…
You already size positions tightly, respect daily stops, and want faster funding — accepting tighter 4%/7% drawdown and a single +10% hurdle.
Decision checklist
Have you passed a prop evaluation before? 1-step may fit.
Do you often hit 3–4% daily loss? 2-step gives more standard margin.
Is your strategy swing/position spot? Both work — size for drawdown first.
Read full rules on the pricing page before checkout.
Related guides
Compare plans live
See capital sizes, splits and challenge types on one page.
Open pricing